This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1534484308315882v1 7/2/142    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Matthiesen, J. K. Articles by Tissington, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Four-Factor Taxonomy of Relocation Outcomes

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: J.K.Matthiesen{at}aston.ac.uk.

	Abstract

Relocation, an intraorganizational geographical transfer, can be used for human resource development (HRD) because of the positive developmental effects it can induce. It is, thus, important for HRD professionals to understand the implications of relocation to ensure it is used appropriately and effectively as an HRD technique. Research on relocation is abundant but presently lacks integration. This article introduces the Four-Factor Taxonomy of Relocation Outcomes, which summarizes, organizes, and guides research in this area. The taxonomy provides researchers with four dimensions along which to consistently classify relocation outcomes: valence (positive vs. negative), duration (length of effect), magnitude (strength of effect), and quality (type of effect). The article concludes with a discussion of implications for HRD practitioners and researchers.

First published on April 4, 2008, doi:10.1177/1534484308315882

Human Resource Development Review 2008;7:142.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?