|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 1, No. 4,
468-499 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1534484302238437
The Evolution of Capital Theory: A Critique of a Theory of Social Capital and Implications for HRD
Julia Storberg
University of Minnesota
The concept of capital has evolved over time. This article describes the change from capital as classically defined to neocapital, a term that more accurately describes the intangible components of capital. One component of neocapital, social capital, is increasingly being viewed as integral to organizational success. However, theories (and their resulting concepts and operational definitions) of social capital remain underdeveloped and fragmented in specific disciplines (e.g., sociology, psychology, social psychology, political economy). Building on the historical foundation of economic, political science, and management literature, this article reviews and critiques a new theory of social capital and explores possible implications for the field of human resource development. Lins theory, although appropriately categorized as a middle range theory, offers human resource development scholars and practitioners a new way of organizing and conceptualizing the connections between social relationships and individual and organizational performance.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Storberg-Walker and C. Gubbins
Social Networks as a Conceptual and Empirical Tool to Understand and "Do" HRD
Advances in Developing Human Resources,
August 1, 2007;
9(3):
291 - 310.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Storberg-Walker
Borrowing From Others: Appropriating Social Capital Theories for "Doing" HRD
Advances in Developing Human Resources,
August 1, 2007;
9(3):
312 - 340.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Parise
Knowledge Management and Human Resource Development: An Application in Social Network Analysis Methods
Advances in Developing Human Resources,
August 1, 2007;
9(3):
359 - 383.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. O'Donnell, C. Gubbins, D. McGuire, K. M. Jorgensen, L. Bo Henriksen, and T. N. Garavan
Social Capital and HRD: Provocative Insights From Critical Management Studies
Advances in Developing Human Resources,
August 1, 2007;
9(3):
413 - 435.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Gubbins and T. N. Garavan
Studying HRD Practitioners: A Social Capital Model
Human Resource Development Review,
June 1, 2005;
4(2):
189 - 218.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. M. Kessels and R. F. Poell
Andragogy and Social Capital Theory: The Implications for Human Resource Development
Advances in Developing Human Resources,
May 1, 2004;
6(2):
146 - 157.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Storberg-Walker
Comparison of the Dubin, Lynham, and Van de Ven Theory-Building Research Methods and Implications for HRD
Human Resource Development Review,
June 1, 2003;
2(2):
211 - 222.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|